Webber’s scholarship shapes Supreme Court debate | Queen's Law
As Canada’s highest court considers the constitutional future of Quebec’s Bill 21, Professor Grégoire Webber’s rethinking of the notwithstanding clause is now central to one of the most consequential Charter cases.
Through his scholarship on the notwithstanding clause, Professor Grégoire Webber, Canada Research Chair in Public Law and Philosophy of Law (2014–2024), is influencing a constitutional debate now before the Supreme Court of Canada. Through his scholarship on the notwithstanding clause, Professor Grégoire Webber, Canada Research Chair in Public Law and Philosophy of Law (2014-2024), is influencing a legal debate now before the Supreme Court of Canada. As Canada’s highest court considers the constitutional future of Quebec’s Bill 21, Professor Grégoire Webber ’s rethinking of the notwithstanding
Explore this link on the map →saved by
related reading
- Legal Provisions Considered by the Court | Supreme Court Databasescdb.la.psu.edu
- Supreme Court Did the Right Thing in Child Pornography Rulingcarleton.ca
- Betteridge's law of headlines - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- Everson v. Board of Education - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- Twenty-seventh Amendment to the United States Constitution - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- McDaniel v. Paty - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- Locke v. Davey - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- Zelman v. Simmons-Harris - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- The Law on Trial - The Driftthedriftmag.com
- Laurentian University Faculty Association files Charter challenge against the province | CBC Newscbc.ca
- The King-Byng Affair | Today in Ottawa's Historytodayinottawashistory.wordpress.com