✳flâneur — a map of the web's best reading

Carl Guo on X: "New Paper 📄: LMs just want to explain themselves! When we SFT an LM on explanations of its own behaviors, do they learn to actually introspect, or do they merely imitate the original training distribution? We find evidence for the former. Despite training on a static set of https://t.co/AnznpunrJ6" / X

x.com · 136 words · saved by 1 readers

New Paper 📄: LMs just want to explain themselves! When we SFT an LM on explanations of its own behaviors, do they learn to actually introspect, or do they merely imitate the original training distribution? We find evidence for the former. Despite training on a static set of

Carl Guo @CarlGuo866 New Paper 📄: LMs just want to explain themselves! When we SFT an LM on explanations of its own behaviors, do they learn to actually introspect, or do they merely imitate the original training distribution? We find evidence for the former. Despite training on a static set of explanations from a base model, the SFT-ed model explains its own current behaviors better than the base model’s behaviors, tracking behavioral drift even when we don’t explicitly train it to. We call this introspective coupling: self-explanations track a model’s own behavior as that behavior changes,

Explore this link on the map →

related reading