✳flâneur — a map of the web's best reading

Your Review: Of Mice, Mechanisms, and Dementia

astralcodexten.com · 7,057 words · saved by 1 readers

[This is one of the finalists in the 2025 review contest, written by an ACX reader who will remain anonymous until after voting is done. I’ll be posting about one of these a week for several months. When you’ve read them all, I’ll ask you to vote for a favorite, so remember which ones you liked] “The scientific paper is a ‘fraud’ that creates “a totally misleading narrative of the processes of thought that go into the making of scientific discoveries.” This critique comes not from a conspiracist on the margins of science, but from Nobel laureate Sir Peter Medawar. A brilliant experimentalist whose work on immune tolerance laid the foundation for modern organ transplantation, Sir Peter understood both the power and the limitations of scientific communication. Consider the familiar structure of a scientific paper: Introduction (background and hypothesis), Methods, Results, Discussion, Conclusion. This format implies that the work followed a clean, sequential progression: scientists ident

Your Review: Of Mice, Mechanisms, and Dementia Finalist #3 in the Review Contest a reader Jul 11, 2025 183 170 22 Share [This is one of the finalists in the 2025 review contest, written by an ACX reader who will remain anonymous until after voting is done. I’ll be posting about one of these a week for several months. When you’ve read them all, I’ll ask you to vote for a favorite, so remember which ones you liked] “The scientific paper is a ‘ fraud ’ that creates “a totally misleading narrative of the processes of thought that go into the making of scientific discoveries.” This critique comes n

Explore this link on the map →

related reading