✳flâneur — a map of the web's best reading

Frontiers | Identifying prodromal symptoms at high specificity for Parkinson’s disease

frontiersin.org · 1,106 words · saved by 1 readers

Introduction: To test drugs with the potential to prevent the onset of Parkinson’s disease (PD), it is key to identify individuals in the general population at high risk of developing PD. This is often difficult because most of the clinical markers are non-specific, common in PD but also common in older adults (e.g., sleep problems). Objective: We aimed to identify the clinical markers at high specificity for developing PD by comparing individuals with PD or prodromal PD to healthy controls. Methods: We investigated motor and non-motor symptoms (Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale Part 1 and 2 items) in 64 prodromal PD and 422 PD individuals calculating the odds ratios, adjusting for age and gender, for PD and prodromal PD versus 195 healthy controls. Symptoms at high specificity were defined as having an adjusted odds ratio ≥ 6. Results: Constipation had an adjusted odds ratio, 6.14 [95% CI: 2.94–12.80] showing high specificity for prodromal PD, and spee

;import{g as i,s as o,r as s,e as a,a as u,h as l,b as c,i as h,t as f,c as d,d as p,f as m,j as g,k as y,l as b,K as v,_ as w,S as E,m as _,o as C,w as M,n as S,p as O,q as B,u as D,v as I,x as T,y as x,z as R,A as N,U as k,H as F,B as L,C as P,Y as U,D as j,E as q,F as z,G as $,I as V,J as H,L as W,M as G,N as K,O as Z,P as Y,Q as J,R as X,T as Q,V as AA,W as eA,X as tA,Z as rA,$ as nA,a0 as iA,a1 as oA,a2 as sA,a3 as aA,a4 as uA,a5 as lA,a6 as cA,a7 as hA,a8 as fA,a9 as dA,aa as pA,ab as mA,ac as gA,ad as yA,ae as bA,af as vA,ag as wA,ah as EA,ai as _A,aj as CA,ak as MA,al as SA,am as OA,an

Explore this link on the map →

related reading