Catching AIs red-handed
If your AIs are trying to escape, it's crucial to think about whether you can catch them before they succeed, because catching them red-handed gives you lots of options you didn't have before.
Catching AIs red-handed If your AIs are trying to escape, it's crucial to think about whether you can catch them before they succeed, because catching them red-handed gives you lots of options you didn't have before. Buck Shlegeris and Ryan Greenblatt May 07, 2024 5 1 Share [Originally posted on LessWrong .] We’ve been spending a lot of time recently thinking about how to mitigate risks posed by scheming (a.k.a. deceptively aligned) models intentionally subverting your safety techniques in order to cause an unacceptable outcome. We empirically investigated techniques that are robust to intenti
Explore this link on the map →saved by
related reading
- Catching AIs red-handed — LessWronglesswrong.com
- AI catastrophes and rogue deployments - by Buck Shlegerisblog.redwoodresearch.org
- The case for ensuring that powerful AIs are controlled — LessWronglesswrong.com
- The Case Against AI Control Research — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Buck Shlegeris on controlling AI that wants to take over – so we can use it anyway | 80,000 Hours80000hours.org
- AI 2027ai-2027.com
- AI Control: Improving Safety Despite Intentional Subversion — LessWronglesswrong.com
- AI Control: Improving Safety Despite Intentional Subversion — AI Alignment Forumalignmentforum.org
- The case for ensuring that powerful AIs are controlledblog.redwoodresearch.org
- Recommendations for Technical AI Safety Research Directionsalignment.anthropic.com
- How will we update about scheming? - by Ryan Greenblattredwoodresearch.substack.com
- [2312.06942] AI Control: Improving Safety Despite Intentional Subversionarxiv.org