✳flâneur — a map of the web's best reading
No Universally Compelling Arguments
readthesequences.com · 1,552 words · saved by 1 readers
What is so terrifying about the idea that not every possible mind might agree with us, even in principle?
No Universally Compelling Arguments Source Markdown · Talk Home About Search Contents No Universally Compelling Arguments ❦ What is so terrifying about the idea that not every possible mind might agree with us, even in principle? For some folks, nothing—it doesn’t bother them in the slightest. And for some of those folks, the reason it doesn’t bother them is that they don’t have strong intuitions about standards and truths that go beyond personal whims. If they say the sky is blue, or that murder is wrong, that’s just their personal opinion; and that someone else might have a different opinion
Explore this link on the map →related reading
- AGI Ruin: A List of Lethalities — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Galaxy brain resistancevitalik.eth.limo
- Unfalsifiable stories of doom | Mechanize, Inc.mechanize.work
- Local Validity as a Key to Sanity and Civilization — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Superintelligence: The Idea That Eats Smart Peopleidlewords.com
- Moral Particularism - www.ethikseite.deethikseite.de
- Mirrors and Paintings — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Shtetl-Optimized >> Blog Archive >> My podcast with Dan Faggellascottaaronson.blog
- The Best of LessWrong — LessWronglesswrong.com
- The Magnitude of His Own Folly — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Dialogue: Is there a Natural Abstraction of Good? — LessWronglesswrong.com
- An Objection to Chalmers's Fading Qualia Argumenteschwitz.substack.com