Automating philosophy if Timothy Williamson is correct — LessWrong
Edit: This post duplicated a shortform I wrote 6 months ago, which I'd forgotten about when going through my drafts yesterday. Apologies! This post s…
x Automating philosophy if Timothy Williamson is correct — LessWrong Meta-Philosophy AI World Modeling Frontpage 54 Automating philosophy if Timothy Williamson is correct by Cleo Nardo 20th Apr 2026 3 min read 19 54 Edit: This post duplicated a shortform I wrote 6 months ago, which I'd forgotten about when going through my drafts yesterday. Apologies! This post supercedes the shortform, but interested readers should check its replies. Timothy Williamson thinks philosophy is unexceptional. Timothy Williamson [1] thinks that philosophy [2] is far less distinct as a science as many people believe
Explore this link on the map →saved by
related reading
- How to Do Philosophypaulgraham.com
- How to Do Philosophypaulgraham.com
- Why I'm not a philosophergleech.org
- On the Utility of Philosophylogangraves.com
- Philosophy: A Diseased Discipline — LessWronglesswrong.com
- What Philosophy Is Good Forjessylin.com
- Against Modal Logics — LessWronglesswrong.com
- How To Think Real Good | Meta-rationalitymetarationality.com
- Fake thinking and real thinking - Joe Carlsmithjoecarlsmith.com
- Philosophy: A Diseased Discipline — LessWronglesswrong.com
- How Philosophers Think - David Perellperell.com
- Philosophy - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org