✳flâneur — a map of the web's best reading
Aren’t developers regularly making their AIs nice and safe and obedient? | If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies | If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies
ifanyonebuildsit.com · 2,721 words · saved by 1 readers
Resources and Q&A for the book If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies.
Aren’t developers regularly making their AIs nice and safe and obedient? AIs steer in alien directions that only mostly coincide with helpfulness. Modern AIs are pretty helpful (or at least not harmful) to most users, most of the time. But as we noted above , a critical question is how to distinguish an AI that deeply wants to be helpful and do the right thing, from an AI with weirder and more complex drives that happen to line up with helpfulness under typical conditions, but which would prefer other conditions and outcomes even more. * Both sorts of AIs would act helpful in the typical case.
Explore this link on the map →saved by
related reading
- Agentic Misalignment: How LLMs Could be Insider Threats — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Double Standards and AI Pessimism1a3orn.com
- Current AIs seem pretty misaligned to me — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Unfalsifiable stories of doom | Mechanize, Inc.mechanize.work
- Dario Amodei — The Adolescence of Technologydarioamodei.com
- AI Induced Psychosis: A shallow investigation — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Did Claude 3 Opus align itself via gradient hacking? — LessWronglesswrong.com
- The Persona Selection Model: Why AI Assistants might Behave like Humansalignment.anthropic.com
- trees are harlequins, words are harlequins - the voidnostalgebraist.tumblr.com
- Current AIs seem pretty misaligned to meblog.redwoodresearch.org
- AI #87: Staying in Character - by Zvi Mowshowitzthezvi.substack.com
- Claude’s Character \ Anthropicanthropic.com