Designing for Thinking
It sounds obvious that software isn’t like real world objects, it has no inherent gravity, softness, or squeeze-ability. But it does have its own kind of shape and weight.
Designing for Thinking Designing for Thinking | pketh.org About Archives RSS Kinopio Aug ’20 Designing for Thinking kinopio design It sounds obvious that software isn’t like real world objects, it has no inherent gravity, softness, or squeeze-ability. But it does have its own kind of shape and weight. That shape comes from helping you do what you can’t in the physical world. Great software responds with the enthusiasm of a puppy on a road trip, you build up a rapport with it, and it becomes an extension of your mind. Software designed to replicate a physical experience will always suck because
Explore this link on the map →related reading
- Magic Ink: Information Software and the Graphical Interfaceworrydream.com
- Magic Ink: Information Software and the Graphical Interfaceworrydream.com
- Tools for thought: science, design, art, craftsmanship? | Andy Matuschakandymatuschak.org
- Issue 002 / Internet Playgroundswoolgather.sh
- Andy Matuschakandymatuschak.org
- Thought as a Technologycognitivemedium.com
- May-Li Khoe on pulling inspiration from the physical world in digital designnotion.so
- Design with materials, not features | thesephist.comthesephist.com
- Frank Chimero · What Screens Wantfrankchimero.com
- Computers and Creativity · Molly Mielkemollymielke.com
- Andy Matuschak on physically-informed digital interface designnotion.so
- Spatial Interfaces | Dark Blue Heavendarkblueheaven.com