What intelligence tests miss | The Psychologist
Some cookies on this site are essential, and the site won't work as expected without them. These cookies are set when you submit a form, login or interact with the site by doing something that goes beyond clicking on simple links.
What intelligence tests miss | BPS Cognition and perception What intelligence tests miss Keith E. Stanovich and Richard F. West on why we need rationality quotient (RQ) tests as well as IQ tests. 15 February 2014 Share this page In psychology and among the lay public alike, high scores on intelligence tests are considered a mark of good thinking. This is not unreasonable. It is now over 100 years since Spearman first reported a single general intelligence factor, known as g or 'the positive manifold' – the tendency for scores on different cognitive tests to correlate. Indeed, it is rare that a
Explore this link on the map →related reading
- Humans are not automatically strategic — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Why aren't smart people happier? - by Adam Mastroianniexperimental-history.com
- How To Think Real Good | Meta-rationalitymetarationality.com
- Biases: An Introductionreadthesequences.com
- Humans are not automatically strategic — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Rationalization — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Twelve Virtues of Rationality – Eliezer S. Yudkowskyyudkowsky.net
- Your intuitions are not magic — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Why Facts Don’t Change Our Minds | The New Yorkernewyorker.com
- What Do We Mean By "Rationality"? — LessWronglesswrong.com
- IQ is a dismal measure of intelligence - supermemo.gurusupermemo.guru
- Dysrationalia - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org