✳flâneur — a map of the web's best reading
A brain implant changed her life. Then it was removed against her will. | MIT Technology Review
technologyreview.com · 2,026 words · saved by 1 readers
Her case highlights why we need to enshrine neuro rights in law.
A brain implant changed her life. Then it was removed against her will. | MIT Technology Review Skip to Content Sticking an electrode inside a person’s brain can do more than treat a disease. Take the case of Rita Leggett, an Australian woman whose experimental brain implant changed her sense of agency and self. She told researchers that she “became one” with her device. She was devastated when, two years later, she was told she had to remove the implant because the company that made it had gone bust. The removal of this implant, and others like it, might represent a breach of human rights, et
Explore this link on the map →related reading
- When Mind Melds With Machine, Who’s in Control? | WIREDwired.com
- Brain–computer interface - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- Brain implant lets man with complete paralysis spell out thoughts | Hacker Newsnews.ycombinator.com
- Mind uploading - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- Implant turns thoughts into words at high speed - Futurityfuturity.org
- Shit for Brains | Danielle Carrthebaffler.com
- The Goals of Neurotechnologymilan.cvitkovic.net
- Neuroethics (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)plato.stanford.edu
- An ALS patient set a record communicating through a brain implant: 62 words per minute | MIT Technology Reviewtechnologyreview.com
- Questions to ask when evaluating neurotech approachesowlposting.com
- Absurd Adventure And Amygdalectomy Advocacyastralcodexten.com
- www.thekurzweillibrary.comthekurzweillibrary.com