✳flâneur — a map of the web's best reading
The one science reform we can all agree on, but we're too cowardly to do
experimental-history.com · 3,051 words · saved by 2 readers
OR: the long overdue forest fire
The one science reform we can all agree on, but we're too cowardly to do OR: the long overdue forest fire Adam Mastroianni Mar 03, 2026 922 85 188 Share Article voiceover 0:00 -18:25 Audio playback is not supported on your browser. Please upgrade. photo cred: my dad If you ever want a good laugh, ask an academic to explain what they get paid to do, and who pays them to do it. In STEM fields, it works like this: the university pays you to teach, but unless you’re at a liberal arts college, you don’t actually get promoted or recognized for your teaching. Instead, you get promoted and recognized
Explore this link on the map →saved by
related reading
- How Life Sciences Actually Work: Findings of a Year-Long Investigation - Alexey Guzeyguzey.com
- Sci-Hub is fundraising | Hacker Newsnews.ycombinator.com
- An invitation to a secret society - by Adam Mastroianniexperimental-history.com
- Is the staggeringly profitable business of scientific publishing bad for science? | Science | The Guardiantheguardian.com
- Market Failures in Sciencemilan.cvitkovic.net
- A Vision of Metasciencescienceplusplus.org
- Elsevier — my part in its downfall | Gowers's Webloggowers.wordpress.com
- A Vision of Metasciencescienceplusplus.org
- The rise and fall of peer review - by Adam Mastroianniexperimentalhistory.substack.com
- Let’s build a fleet and change the worldexperimental-history.com
- Real peer review has never been tried - Works in Progress Magazineworksinprogress.co
- FQxI Article: How to Start Your Own Journal: The Open Journal of Astrophysicsqspace.fqxi.org