Government must take a VC approach to funding research | STAT
Congress is floating a 40% cut to the National Science Foundation and deep reductions to the National Institutes of Health — America’s two flagship research engines. The justification? A $2 trillion deficit. But cutting science to fix the deficit is like burning your seed corn because you’re low on groceries. It’s fiscally shortsighted and strategically self-defeating. ADVERTISEMENT Here’s a better idea: Stop treating public research funding as a sunk cost. Treat it like a venture capital investment. For decades, the U.S. government has played the role of an early-stage investor, seeding everything from cancer immunotherapies to recombinant insulin, from CRISPR to quantum computing. But unlike any rational investor, the federal government takes no royalties, no equity, no intellectual property. NIH and NSF fund the riskiest phase of innovation — and then walk away from the upside. This is no accident. The Bayh-Dole Act of 1980 allows universities and small businesses to retain full own
First Opinion First Opinion July 22, 2026 What Argentina’s World Cup loss should teach American hospitals
Explore this link on the map →related reading
- Home | Levers for Progressleversforprogress.com
- 7 basic science discoveries that changed the worldnature.com
- Science: A New Golden Age – The White Housewhitehouse.gov
- To supercharge science, first experiment with how it is fundedeconomist.com
- The Fight For Slow And Boring Research—Asteriskasteriskmag.com
- The trouble in comparing different approaches to science fundingscienceplusplus.org
- Work on these things - Marginal REVOLUTIONmarginalrevolution.com
- How Life Sciences Actually Work: Findings of a Year-Long Investigation - Alexey Guzeyguzey.com
- What We Learned Doing Fast Grants | Futurefuture.a16z.com
- Steve Blank No Science, No Startups: The Innovation Engine We’re Switching Offsteveblank.com
- Silicon Valley’s New Obsession: Science Funding - The Atlantictheatlantic.com
- How research grant applications are slowing scientific progress | Voxvox.com