✳flâneur — a map of the web's best reading
Lecture 01. Strong Models Don't Mean Reliable Execution | Learn Harness Engineering
walkinglabs.github.io · 1,805 words · saved by 1 readers
A project-based course on designing the environments, state, verification, and control systems that make Codex and Claude Code reliable.
Lecture 01. Strong Models Don't Mean Reliable Execution | Learn Harness Engineering Skip to content Menu Return to top 中文版 → Code examples: code/ Practice project: Project 01. Prompt-Only vs. Rules-First: How Much Difference Does a Harness Make Lecture 01. Strong Models Don't Mean Reliable Execution As of late 2025, the strongest coding agents on SWE-bench Verified achieve roughly a 50-60% pass rate. That number sounds decent at first glance — but don't celebrate just yet. Those are carefully selected tasks with clear issue descriptions and ready-made test cases. Hand the agent your everyday
Explore this link on the map →saved by
related reading
- How to Harness Coding Agents with the Right Infrastructure | Blogalexlavaee.me
- Multi-Agents: What's Actually Working | Cognitioncognition.ai
- Effective harnesses for long-running agents \ Anthropicanthropic.com
- Harness engineering for coding agent usersmartinfowler.com
- Demystifying evals for AI agents \ Anthropicanthropic.com
- Building reliable AI agents · parth sareenparthsareen.com
- [2604.25850] Agentic Harness Engineering: Observability-Driven Automatic Evolution of Coding-Agent Harnessesarxiv.org
- A Guide to Claude Code 2.0 and getting better at using coding agents – sankalp's blogsankalp.bearblog.dev
- Don’t Outsource Your Thinkingteltam.github.io
- Shipping at Inference-Speed | Peter Steinbergersteipete.me
- The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Agentic Loopsweb.navan.dev
- Composer2.pdfcursor.com