flâneur — a map of the web's best reading

Ten weird moral theories – Spencer Greenberg

spencergreenberg.com · 461 words · saved by 1 readers

1. Occamism: the simpler a moral theory is, the more likely it is to be true. Hence (a priori), the most probable two moral theories are that (a) everything is permissible or that (b) nothing is. 2. Majoritarianism: an action is morally right if and only if the majority of conscious beings capable of understanding that action and its consequences think it’s right. 3. Restraintism: if you have the desire to do something, then you don’t get moral credit for doing it (since the action is satisfying your OWN desire). So, to maximize the good you do, become the sort of person that hates everyone and doesn’t want to help – then help a lot anyway! 4. Infinitarianism: god is infinite goodness. A finite number plus an infinite number is just the same infinite number again (left unchanged). All actions humans take can only create finite good. Hence, no human action can change the total goodness in the universe. 5. Virtue ethics prime: virtue ethicists are right – being good is only about having

1. Occamism: the simpler a moral theory is, the more likely it is to be true. Hence (a priori), the most probable two moral theories are that (a) everything is permissible or that (b) nothing is. 2. Majoritarianism: an action is morally right if and only if the majority of conscious beings capable of understanding that action and its consequences think it’s right. 3. Restraintism: if you have the desire to do something, then you don’t get moral credit for doing it (since the action is satisfying your OWN desire). So, to maximize the good you do, become the sort of person that hates

Explore this link on the map →

related reading