✳flâneur — a map of the web's best reading

US NSF - : Broader Impacts Review Criterion -- Dear Colleague Letter nsf07046

nsf.gov · 567 words · saved by 1 readers

Official websites use .gov A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States. Secure .gov websites use HTTPS. A lock (LockLocked padlock) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. This document has been archived. Dear Colleague, The National Science Foundation employs two criteria in the merit review of proposals: What is the intellectual merit of the proposed activity? What are the broader impacts of the proposed activity? While most researchers know what is meant by Intellectual Merit, experience shows that many researchers have a less than clear understanding of the meaning of Broader Impacts. The NSF Grant Proposal Guide uses a series of questions to illustrate the Broader Impacts criterion: “How well does the activity advance discovery and understanding while promo

Dear Colleague Letter Broader Impacts Review Criterion August 29, 2007 Dear Colleague, The National Science Foundation employs two criteria in the merit review of proposals: What is the intellectual merit of the proposed activity? What are the broader impacts of the proposed activity? While most researchers know what is meant by Intellectual Merit, experience shows that many researchers have a less than clear understanding of the meaning of Broader Impacts. The NSF Grant Proposal Guide uses a series of questions to illustrate the Broader Impacts criterion: “How well does the activity advance d

Explore this link on the map →

related reading