✳flâneur — a map of the web's best reading
The dumbest chess AI has a lesson for us - The Atlantic
theatlantic.com · 1,159 words · saved by 1 readers
Martin is designed to fail at its only task—a reminder that AI doesn’t actually need humanlike smarts to be useful.
When IBM’s Deep Blue first defeated Garry Kasparov in 1997, the world chess champion accused the company of cheating. There was no way, he thought, that the computer could have beaten him without direct assistance from a skilled human player. But now the situation has flipped entirely. When grandmasters find themselves at the receiving end of a few mind-blowingly brilliant moves today, they accuse their opponent of using a computer . The only worthwhile competition for top chess engines is one another. The programs have become too powerful; humankind has lost. But as the machines push toward c
Explore this link on the map →related reading
- How Go Players Disempower Themselves to AI — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Infinite midwit - by Adam Mastroianniexperimental-history.com
- The Future Role of Human Excellence - Too-biasedtobi.lutke.com
- A Very Unlikely Chess Game | Slate Star Codexslatestarcodex.com
- The Tale of the Top-Tier Intellect — LessWronglesswrong.com
- elevanth.org/2021_06_21_RFDT_2_of_3.htmlelevanth.org
- Does the Bitter Lesson Have Limits?dbreunig.com
- AI will change the world, but won’t take it over by playing “3-dimensional chess”. – Windows On Theorywindowsontheory.org
- Playing chess with large language modelsnicholas.carlini.com
- What and How to Teach When Google Knows Everything and ChatGPT Explains It All Very Well | Office of the Presidentpresident.gatech.edu
- Shortform — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Mathematics for humanshome.sandiego.edu