✳flâneur — a map of the web's best reading
Notes from the Lighthaven Daniel Kokotajlo & Dean Ball debate
jasminexli.substack.com · 2,399 words · saved by 1 readers
timely thoughts on regulation, centralization, & AI risk
Notes from the Lighthaven Daniel Kokotajlo & Dean Ball debate timely thoughts on regulation, centralization, & AI risk Jasmine Li Mar 10, 2026 45 12 6 Share event was on 3/9/26, ran by anti-debate ! edited with opus 4.6. i did my best to accurately represent the arguments — let me know of any misrepresentations! TLDR and summary first; my takes at the end. Debate Question: Given advanced AI, is it time for government to step in and guide development, or should we leave it to the market? TLDR: Kokotajlo thinks regulation is necessary because concentration of power (both corporate and government
Explore this link on the map →related reading
- Dario Amodei — The Adolescence of Technologydarioamodei.com
- Dario Amodei — Policy on the AI Exponentialdarioamodei.com
- Strategic Visionsstatic1.squarespace.com
- AI Regulation is Unsafe — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Policy ideas for mitigating AI risk — EA Forumforum.effectivealtruism.org
- On Dwarkesh's Podcast with Leopold Aschenbrennerthezvi.substack.com
- 2028: Two scenarios for global AI leadership \ Anthropicanthropic.com
- AI vs. the Pentagon - by Jasmine Sun - @jasmine’s substackjasmi.news
- Early US policy priorities for AGI - by Nick Marshblog.ai-futures.org
- Soft Nationalization: how the USG will control AI labs — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Dario Amodei — The Adolescence of Technologydarioamodei.com
- Plans A, B, C, and D for misalignment risk — LessWronglesswrong.com