✳flâneur — a map of the web's best reading
Computational Complexity: Favorite Theorems: Relativization
blog.computationalcomplexity.org · 1,755 words · saved by 1 readers
February Edition After the work of Cook and Karp popularized the P versus NP question, computer scientists immediately tried hard to prove...
Computational Complexity: Favorite Theorems: Relativization Tuesday, March 21, 2006 Favorite Theorems: Relativization February Edition After the work of Cook and Karp popularized the P versus NP question, computer scientists immediately tried hard to prove P=NP or P≠NP. Baker, Gill and Solovay showed that most of their approaches were doomed to failure. Theodore Baker, John Gill, Robert Solovay, Relativization of the P=?NP Question , SICOMP 1975. Baker, Gill and Solovay noted that complexity proofs relativized, that is held even if all machines involved could make queries to some "oracle
Explore this link on the map →related reading
- P versus NP problem - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- Computational Complexityblog.computationalcomplexity.org
- Shtetl-Optimized >> Blog Archive >> Ten Signs a Claimed Mathematical Breakthrough is Wrongscottaaronson.blog
- Computational Complexity Theory (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)plato.stanford.edu
- Complexity Theory’s 50-Year Journey to the Limits of Knowledge | Quanta Magazinequantamagazine.org
- Complexity class - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- COMP 598 Fall 2020 - Proof Complexitycs.mcgill.ca
- PCP theorem - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- 15-855: Graduate Computational Complexity Theory, Fall 2017cs.cmu.edu
- What's new | Updates on my research and expository papers, discussion of open problems, and other maths-related topics. By Terence Taoterrytao.wordpress.com
- Shtetl-Optimized >> Blog Archive >> The First Law of Complexodynamicsscottaaronson.blog
- NP-completeness - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org