[2504.04072] Among Us: A Sandbox for Measuring and Detecting Agentic Deception
Abstract:Prior studies on deception in language-based AI agents typically assess whether the agent produces a false statement about a topic, or makes a binary choice prompted by a goal, rather than allowing open-ended deceptive behavior to emerge in pursuit of a longer-term goal. To fix this, we introduce Among Us, a sandbox social deception game where LLM-agents exhibit long-term, open-ended deception as a consequence of the game objectives. While most benchmarks saturate quickly, Among Us can be expected to last much longer, because it is a multi-player game far from equilibrium. Using the sandbox, we evaluate 18 proprietary and open-weight LLMs and uncover a general trend: models trained with RL are comparatively much better at producing deception than detecting it. We evaluate the effectiveness of methods to detect lying and deception: logistic regression on the activations and sparse autoencoders (SAEs). We find that probes trained on a dataset of "pretend you're a dishonest model:.." generalize extremely well out-of-distribution, consistently obtaining AUROCs over 95% even when evaluated just on the deceptive statement, without the chain of thought. We also find two SAE features that work well at deception detection but are unable to steer the model to lie less. We hope our open-sourced sandbox, game logs, and probes serve to anticipate and mitigate deceptive behavior and capabilities in language-based agents.
[2504.04072] Among Us: A Sandbox for Measuring and Detecting Agentic Deception Skip to main content arXiv is now an independent nonprofit! Learn more × Search arXiv Press Enter to search · Advanced search --> Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence arXiv:2504.04072 (cs) [Submitted on 5 Apr 2025 ( v1 ), last revised 10 Feb 2026 (this version, v3)] Title: Among Us: A Sandbox for Measuring and Detecting Agentic Deception Authors: Satvik Golechha , Adrià Garriga-Alonso View a PDF of the paper titled Among Us: A Sandbox for Measuring and Detecting Agentic Deception, by Satvik Golech
Explore this link on the map →related reading
- [2401.05566] Sleeper Agents: Training Deceptive LLMs that Persist Through Safety Trainingarxiv.org
- Can Agents Fool Each Other? - AI Villagetheaidigest.org
- Natural Deception with RL - Rajan Agarwalrajan.sh
- Detecting Strategic Deception Using Linear Probes — LessWronglesswrong.com
- How confessions can keep language models honest | OpenAIopenai.com
- Sandbagging with misaligned action - Chain-of-Thought Transcript - Anti-Schemingantischeming.ai
- Chapter 1: Transformer Interpretability - ARENAlearn.arena.education
- Introspection Adapters: Training LLMs to Report Their Learned Behaviorsarxiv.org
- Discovering Language Model Behaviors with Model-Written Evaluations — LessWronglesswrong.com
- confessions_paper.pdfcdn.openai.com
- Simple probes can catch sleeper agents \ Anthropicanthropic.com
- The Road To Honest AI - by Scott Alexanderastralcodexten.com