✳flâneur — a map of the web's best reading
Intent-Based Architectures and Their Risks - Paradigm
paradigm.xyz · 2,994 words · saved by 1 readers
The road to centralisation is paved with good intents.
Intent-Based Architecture and Their Risks 06.01.2023 By Georgios Konstantopoulos , Quintus Kilbourn [L] Listen [S] Share Link , Markdown , X , LinkedIn Introduction Recently, discussion around “intents” and their application have been a dominant topic in the Ethereum community. If a transaction explicitly refers to “how” an action should be performed, an intent refers to “what” the desired outcome of that action should be. If a transaction says “do A then B, pay exactly C to get X back” , an intent says “I want X and I’m willing to pay up to C” . This declarative paradigm unlocks exciting impr
Explore this link on the map →related reading
- Towards an intent-centric topology | The Anoma Bloganoma.net
- Asset Based Intent Standard: An Intent Standard for the World of Digital Assetsblog.essential.builders
- Ethereum is a Dark Forest - Paradigmparadigm.xyz
- Should Ethereum be okay with enshrining more things in the protocol?vitalik.eth.limo
- Approaches to MEV: Ethereum vs Cosmos | Reveriereverie.ooo
- Introducing ERC-7521: Generalized Intents for Smart Contract Walletsblog.essential.builders
- The Hitchhiker's Guide to Ethereum - Delphi Digitalmembers.delphidigital.io
- Flashbots: Frontrunning the MEV crisis | Flashbotsmedium.com
- [1904.05234] Flash Boys 2.0: Frontrunning, Transaction Reordering, and Consensus Instability in Decentralized Exchangesarxiv.org
- The Little Transaction that Could: Sequencers, MEV, Intents, and… — Archetypearchetype.mirror.xyz
- Flashbots: Frontrunning the MEV crisis - Economics - Ethereum Researchethresear.ch
- Priority Is All You Need - Paradigmparadigm.xyz