Making Something Social Destroys the Truth of It
Making something social destroys the truth of it because social groups need consensus to survive—otherwise they fight and can’t get along—and consensus is all about compromise, not truth-seeking. Science—at least the natural sciences—was this unique discipline where you could have an individual truth-seeking on behalf of the rest of society. Other individuals verify that they did, indeed, have the best current model of how reality works, and then that could be spread out through inventions to the rest of society. More
Naval --> Dec 6 2021 Naval: Making something social destroys the truth of it because social groups need consensus to survive—otherwise they fight and can’t get along—and consensus is all about compromise, not truth-seeking. Science—at least the natural sciences—was this unique discipline where you could have an individual truth-seeking on behalf of the rest of society. Other individuals verify that they did, indeed, have the best current model of how reality works, and then that could be spread out through inventions to the rest of society. But the social sciences are this virus that crept int
Explore this link on the map →related reading
- A Vision of Metasciencescienceplusplus.org
- Is There a Crisis of Truth? | Los Angeles Review of Bookslareviewofbooks.org
- A Vision of Metasciencescienceplusplus.org
- Great Founder Theory - Samo Burjasamoburja.com
- Cargo Cult Sciencecalteches.library.caltech.edu
- An invitation to a secret society - by Adam Mastroianniexperimental-history.com
- How Life Sciences Actually Work: Findings of a Year-Long Investigation - Alexey Guzeyguzey.com
- Why the Past 10 Years of American Life Have Been Uniquely Stupid - The Atlantictheatlantic.com
- Don’t Learn Value From Societypalladiummag.com
- Could Gambling Save Science?mason.gmu.edu
- Why Are There So Many Rationalist Cults?—Asteriskasteriskmag.com
- Power Lies Trembling: a three-book review — LessWronglesswrong.com