Membership NFTs — natimuril
In the context of crypto, social networks are better described as socioeconomic networks. The major difference being that economic utility is built natively into your group chat. Communities are structured around a shared treasury, with each holder staked in its success through token ownership. Large treasuries are made up of primarily ERC-20 tokens, which offer more liquidity, diversification, and accessibility.
In the context of crypto, social networks are better described as socioeconomic networks. The major difference being that economic utility is built natively into your group chat. Communities are structured around a shared treasury, with each holder staked in its success through token ownership. Large treasuries are made up of primarily ERC-20 tokens, which offer more liquidity, diversification, and accessibility. Despite this, not all communities need a token. In fact, most don’t. NFTs are an improved model for fungible social tokens. Psychology of a non fungible holder ERC-20s are unfriendly
Explore this link on the map →related reading
- We’re (in) the money - by David Phelps - Three quarksdavidphelps.substack.com
- Come for the Network, Pay for the Toolsubpixel.space
- On Web3 Membership and Composable Monetization — Andrew Hongath.mirror.xyz
- A Practical Guide to NFT Memberships for Creators | Futurefuture.com
- Prosperity Gospel — Real Lifereallifemag.com
- Creator-Community Memberships: From Web2 to Web3 — Catherine Yeomirror.xyz
- Sufficient Decentralization for Social Networks - Varun Srinivasanvarunsrinivasan.com
- Creators, Communities, and the Gray Space in the Middle — Nichanan Kesonpatnichanank.com
- A beginner's guide to NFTs — Mirrorlinda.mirror.xyz
- The Ownership Economy 2022 – Variantvariant.fund
- Designing Token Economies - Not Boring by Packy McCormicknotboring.co
- SocialFi: A Blank Canvas for Web3 Social Apps – Variantvariant.fund