✳flâneur — a map of the web's best reading
Racing through a minefield: the AI deployment problem
cold-takes.com · 4,010 words · saved by 3 readers
Push AI forward too fast, and catastrophe could occur. Too slow, and someone else less cautious could do it. Is there a safe course?
Click lower right to download or find on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Stitcher, etc. In previous pieces, I argued that there's a real and large risk of AI systems' developing dangerous goals of their own and defeating all of humanity - at least in the absence of specific efforts to prevent this from happening. I discussed why it could be hard to build AI systems without this risk and how it might be doable . The “AI alignment problem” refers 1 to a technical problem: how can we design a powerful AI system that behaves as intended, rather than forming its own dangerous aims ? This post is going to
Explore this link on the map →saved by
related reading
- Dario Amodei — The Adolescence of Technologydarioamodei.com
- Core views on AI safety: When, why, what, and how \ Anthropicanthropic.com
- Nearcast-based "deployment problem" analysis — AI Alignment Forumalignmentforum.org
- AI safety - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- How we could stumble into AI catastrophecold-takes.com
- Recommendations for Technical AI Safety Research Directionsalignment.anthropic.com
- Planning for Extreme AI Risks — AI Alignment Forumalignmentforum.org
- Jobs that can help with the most important centurycold-takes.com
- Does AI Progress Have a Speed Limit?—Asteriskasteriskmag.com
- Planning for AGI and beyond | OpenAIopenai.com
- Policy ideas for mitigating AI risk — EA Forumforum.effectivealtruism.org
- Off Target | CNAScnas.org