Amplification and Its Discontents | Knight First Amendment Institute

There is a popular line of reasoning in platform regulation discussions today that says, basically, “Platforms aren’t responsible for what their users say, but they are responsible for what the platforms themselves choose to amplify.” This provides a seemingly simple hook for regulating algorithmic amplification—the results for searches on a search engine like Google or within a platform like Wikipedia; the sequence of posts in the newsfeed on a platform like Twitter or Facebook; or the recommended items on a platform like YouTube or Eventbrite. There’s some utility to that framing. In particular it is useful for people who work for platforms building product features or refining algorithms.

I. Introduction There is a popular line of reasoning in platform regulation discussions today that says, basically, "Platforms aren't responsible for what their users say, but they are responsible for what the platforms themselves choose to amplify." This provides a seemingly simple hook for regulating algorithmic amplification-the results for searches on a search engine like Google or within a platform like Wikipedia; the sequence of posts in the newsfeed on a platform like Twitter or Facebook; or the recommended items on a platform like YouTube or Eventbrite. There's some utility to that fra

related reading

• What Will “Amplification” Mean in Court? | TechPolicy.Presstechpolicy.press
• The Myth of The Algorithm: A system-level view of algorithmic amplification | Knight First Amendment Instituteknightcolumbia.org
• Lawful but Awful? Control over Legal Speech by Platforms, Governments, and Internet Users – The University of Chicago Law Review Onlinelawreviewblog.uchicago.edu
• When Curation Becomes Creation – Approximately Correctapproximatelycorrect.com
• Pluralistic: Tiktok’s enshittification (21 Jan 2023) – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorowpluralistic.net
• The EU’s new Digital Services Act and the Rest of the Worldverfassungsblog.de
• Cavalier Bot Regulation and the First Amendment's Threat Model | Knight First Amendment Instituteknightcolumbia.org
• Daron Acemoglu on X: "This is the second part of what I had promised to explain: why I believe a certain type of content moderation is key for social media. First, I do see the dark side of content moderation: https://t.co/uwcDCexDKP: Freedx.com
• How to Prepare for the Deluge of Generative AI on Social Media | Knight First Amendment Instituteknightcolumbia.org
• Towards Platform Democracy: Policymaking Beyond Corporate CEOs and Partisan Pressure | The Belfer Center for Science and International Affairsbelfercenter.org
• Are Addiction-Inducing Algorithms in Social Media Lawful? - Fair Observerfairobserver.com
• The Santa Clara Principles on Transparency and Accountability in Content Moderationsantaclaraprinciples.org